The episode in question -- The General
-- is "a warning about educational methods. A form of subliminal speed
learning deposits information into the mind, but what is the
value of facts without understanding? Number 6 foils the "General" --
a room-sized computer -- in a manner reminiscent of Capt. Kirk
and Star Trek" (
Source).
Please watch the below exerpts (you will need to click on your
browser's "back" button after viewing a video segment to continue with
this page):
What _is_ SpeedLearn?
"The story deals with two important questions: education and trust. The
question it asks about education is that of its aim. What is education
all about? One obvious answer to that is that it is the imparting of
facts into a willing mind. Socrates saw the mind as a blank slate,
waiting to be written on, and this theory of education corresponds to
his theory. You write the required facts on the brain, and educate it.
This is the main basis behind virtually all systems of education. A
curriculum is laid out, a set of items that a student must know by the
end of a course. if he can parrot back the information at the end of
the course, then he's a great student.
Quite. But are learning facts and education synonymous?"
Source
(NOTE: you will need to scroll down about 2/3s of the way on this link to
read the relevant part of this website).
Our hero -- the doubting Thomas -- clearly is skeptical; skeptical that
it _can_ be done, as opposed to whether or not it _should_ be done.
A Marriage of Science & Mass Communications
Sound familiar? Shades of Thomas Edison and Distance Learning. The technology may be new but the claims are not.
A Giant Leap Forward...
A Revolution in Education
Who doesn't want to move forward? Progress is an unqualified good
thing, right? Especially in education, where the age-old "kill
and drill" methods are deadly dull and require time and effort.
Is the proof in the pudding?
What happened in 1878?
Truly remarkable!
History's not my subject.... Or, is it?
The skeptical hero is suddenly very 'knowledgeable' about European
military history. But is it an illusion? Our hero is
concerned and calls his equivalent of a help desk:
The Help Desk
Why is he concerned? What is/are the implication(s)?
I asked you what it was, not when it was.
Hmmmm...
What it is satirizing....
The 1960s witnessed an era in new educational theories; could computer-assisted learning be one of them?
Faith in technology
The technology, not unlike today's Google and Guttenberg.org
initiatives, seeks to marry computer technologies with the expansive
wealth of human knowledge, the marriage of both worlds.
The Technology: How it "works"
"The Professor" -- a human being after all, synthesizes and distills
human knowledge into factoid, typewritten form. The typed pages
are then fed into a massive analog computer, which spits out the
computerized format that a machine will embed directly into the
student's minds. And, what results?
No more tedious learning!
We'd all like that, right? But, can it be done? What is it
about computer technologies that suggest to us that, because a
computer is fast that learning should be fast and easy? Is it the
computer that is learning? Our hero disagrees and attempts to use
the technology to spread a message of his own:
The freedom to learn, the liberty to make mistakes...
Is it "reactionary drivel"? Is there anything that the computer cannot do? Any answer it cannot provide?
Man versus Machine
The hero claims that "Why?" is 'insoluble, for man or machine,' but the
distinction between man and machine is that man is able to posit the
question of "why?".
As
John Peel
notes, "To assume that it is just a silly question creating a breakdown
in a computer, you have to ignore the fact that the show is an
allegory. It is not the computer that is destroyed by a question, but
what the machine represents... are learning facts and education
synonymous? ... Unless we can apply the knowledge, we may as well not
have it. Education cannot simply be the imparting of facts, can it? "
Can it?
Please create a discussion entry in the "SpeedLearn" forum in which you
examine the following with respect to the exerpts you have just viewed:
What parallels or analogies can you draw between the SpeedLearn clips and
modern education's reliance on computer technologies? With respect to
Postman's observations that we tend to be blindsided by technology's
unanticipated downsides, are there any cautionary tales foreseen by The
Prisoner's creators more than 40 years ago that it is not too late for us
to heed now?
What parallels could you draw between The General and, say, deriving our
"knowledge" from the web or wikipedia? How can these be problematic for
society?
What is the purpose of education in western society? Why should society
continue to invest the considerable amount of money it does in a free
public education?
Distance learning, like SpeedLearn, seeks to use computer and
telecommunications technologies to make education easier and faster. But
is there a trade-off as Postman would argue? What is that trade-off? And
how much should that trade-off matter with respect to society's interest
in having an educated public?